"The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity. I shall not, however, multiply professions on this head. My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast. My arguments will be open to all, and may be judged of by all. They shall at least be offered in a spirit which will not disgrace the cause of truth."
-'Publius' The Federalist No. 1
"A UN treaty has been stalled for years over the definition of a terrorist."
This truly is beyond our realm, it is something past the realm of absurd.
Echoing in everyone's ear is the same liberal mantra...."we must repair our reputation throughout the world".....'we must reach out to these individuals who are wanting to destroy, there HAS to be a reason for this hatred" Why is there not a discussion engaged on this issue? This almighty UN is our protector and the be all, know all of world politics.....
....how long has it been since September 11. 2001? (this asserting that 9/11 happened in a vacuum without prior acts of terrorism) What, roughly 4 years ago? And this organization STILL cannot come up with a definition of what occurred on September 11, 2001? This story should be explored and shown just as much as the sights and pictures from that indescribable day should be shown. This organization, emphatically our world, if you will, cannot accurately put a definition to the word "terrorism." This is why this organization is irrelevant.......this was the same organization that was assuring us that Saddam posed no threat to western civilization. To this day, the United States is vehemently berated do in parcel to this organization and its own inept ability to decide. Did we wait for the definition of 'Japanese' or 'German' before World War II?